Anything pertaining to basketball: college, pro, HS, recruiting, TV coverage
9 reasons Kansas is the most dominant force in NCAA hoops
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
www.foxsports.com/college-basketball/sto...-ku-dominance-021016
He makes a very compelling argument--though, of course, Duke, UK, and UNC might beg to differ.
Certainly you cannot argue with our regular season elite status during the Self era. It's absolutely incredible. And if Self's teams had managed to garner just one more NCAA crown, or perhaps make 2-3 more FF runs, the author's overall argument (per the brash title of the article) would be fairly unassailable. But the post-season matters, and Self and Self-lead KU teams still have some rounding out to do on the resume if they truly want to lay claim to Numero Uno.
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Share this page:
- ATXJayhawk
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 46
To me, it seems rather simple for how you beat a Bill Self coached team in the tournament because I've seen it time and time again. We lost to teams who shoot a lot of three pointers. Here's the numbers for the opponents that eliminated KU in 2010, 2011, 2013, and 2015.
2010 Northern Iowa: ranked 132nd, averaged 18.8 three point shots a game
2011 VCU: ranked 20th, averaged 22.9 three point shots a game
2013 Michigan: ranked 96th, averaged 19.8 three point shots a game
2015 Wichita State: ranked 144th, averaged 19 three point shots a game.
It makes sense when past KU teams relied heavily on our big's to protect the rim and pound the glass. That left the perimeter open a lot of the time for opposing teams to make three point shots. The numbers from those tournament games kind of speak for themselves. Northern Iowa: 9-26 from three, VCU: 12-25 from three, Michigan: 8-23 from three. I'll even throw in Wichita State as they were 10-20 from three. Do you see a recurring theme here?
What about this years team?
So, knowing this I bring you to this years team. Whats different about them? Well, for starters we don't have the dominant inside presence like those past teams had. What we do have is two fast point guards in Frank Mason and Devonte Graham who are able to guard the perimeter. Throw in a more experienced Selden and you have a 3rd option to guard the perimeter. Case and point; KU is ranked 77th in opponent points from 3 pointers. Opposing teams only get 18.8 ppg from three point shots. Thats an average of only 6 three pointers allowed per game. For comparison to other big names ranked ahead of us; W Virginia is ranked 6th, Kentucky is ranked 12th, Michigan State is ranked 13th, Louisville is ranked 29th, K-State is ranked 40th, Wichita State is ranked 63rd. The other schools ahead of us are mostly schools from outside the power 5 conferences.
The 2010 team allowed 19.1 ppg from three point shots (ranked 200), the 2011 team allowed 17.8 ppg from three point shots (ranked 128th), and the 2013 team allowed 19.1 ppg from three point shots (ranked 207).
THE NUMBERS PROVE WE HAVE A TEAM WHO IS REALLY GOOD AT DEFENDING AGAINST THE THREE. THAT SHOULD MAKE EVERYONE OF US REALLY HAPPY MOVING FORWARD.
2010 (national champion caliber numbers)
-Finished the season #2 in Ken Pom's rankings
-Ranked #2 in adjOFF and #9 in adjDEF
-Ranked #1 in average scoring margin
-Ranked #5 in ppg
-Ranked #8 in team shooting %
-Ranked #62 in opponent ppg
-Ranked #4 in opponent shooting %
2011 (national champion caliber numbers)
-Finished the season #2 in Ken Pom's rankings
-Ranked #7 in adjOFF and #11 in adjDEF
-Ranked #3 in average scoring margin
-Ranked #6 in ppg
-Ranked #1 in team shooting %
-Ranked #69 in opponent ppg
-Ranked #11 in opponent shooting %
2013 (final four caliber numbers)
-Finished the season #8 in Ken Pom's rankings
-Ranked #34 in adjOFF and #5 in adjDEF
-Ranked #5 in average scoring margin
-Ranked #18 in ppg
-Ranked #8 in team shooting %
-Ranked #51 in opponent ppg
-Ranked #1 in opponent shooting %
Crimson and blue looks so much better than burnt orange!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bayhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1982
- Thank you received: 871
RC A & F
The end is nothing; the road is all.
-- Jules Michelet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
(1) Your assessment of this year's team, WRT 3-pt FG defense:
Opposing teams only get 18.8 ppg from three point shots. Thats an average of only 6 three pointers allowed per game.
THE NUMBERS PROVE WE HAVE A TEAM WHO IS REALLY GOOD AT DEFENDING AGAINST THE THREE. THAT SHOULD MAKE EVERYONE OF US REALLY HAPPY MOVING FORWARD.
(2) Your analysis of the primary reason for KU's postseason failure in 2010, 2011, and 2013:
The 2010 team allowed 19.1 ppg from three point shots (ranked 200), the 2011 team allowed 17.8 ppg from three point shots (ranked 128th), and the 2013 team allowed 19.1 ppg from three point shots (ranked 207).
If I read your post (and the numbers above) correctly, this year's team is at a virtual statistical tie with the 2010 team (18.8 to 19.1), slightly worse than the 2011 team (18.8 to 17.8 ), and is virtually tied with the 2013 team (18.8 to 19.1).
If you go by raw numbers, it appears that this team gives up just as many made 3-pointers as those three tourney teams. Am I missing something?
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ATXJayhawk
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 46
Here's a comparison of this year to last year for a few schools and points allowed from 3 pointers:
Kentucky
2015: 13.5
2016: 16.1
Duke
2015: 15.2
2016: 19
Wisconsin
2015: 15.2
2016: 17.8
Wichita St
2015: 15.8
2016: 18.3
Kansas St
2015: 16.1
2016: 17.5
Baylor
2015: 17.1
2016: 19.8
Michigan St (They have actually improved their 3 pt defense number this year)
2015: 17.2
2016: 16.3
Kansas
2015: 17.5
2016: 18.8
Texas
2015: 18
2016: 19.2
North Carolina
2015: 19.5
2016: 23.9
The fact that KU has gone from 17.5 to 18.8 points allowed from 3 pointers is great in this season of higher scoring. We are only allowing 1.3 more points from three this season. Our ranking has gone from 101 to 77 in the country compared to last year.
The bottom line is we have improved our three point defense this year even though the actual number is technically higher than last year. But then again almost everyone elses numbers are higher too.
Here's last seasons top 10 rankings for opponent points from 3 pointers
- Fla Atlantic-10.2
- Rhode Island-11.1
- N Mex State-11.3
- TX Christian-12.7
- Pepperdine-13.5
- Manhattan-13.5
- Kentucky-13.5
- Ste F Austin-13.9
- San Diego-14
- Richmond-14.1
- American-13.8
- Rhode Island-14.4
- St Fran (NY)-14.8
- Vanderbilt-15.4
- NC-Wilmgton-15.4
- W Virginia-15.5
- N Dakota St-15.7
- Fla Atlantic-15.8
- Prairie View-15.8
- Manhattan-15.9
Crimson and blue looks so much better than burnt orange!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
So I'm not seeing where this year's team is better at guarding the 3.
I'm not seeing it either, JR, based strictly on the numbers presented. If anything, once you account for a slight uptick in scoring nationally, and evidently one more 3 made per game for the top team in the land (not us), it appears KU is only marginally improved at 3PFG defense this year. And it seems so statistically insignificant as to be a stretch.
The question of why KU has flamed out in the tourney is a separate, albeit interesting sub-dimension to the initial post (which was about KU's purported national "dominance")...and probably deserving of its own thread. Given this year's team's deficiencies, we'll likely get that thread (and it will be a long one) come March or April. I hope we don't, but the odds are we will (as are the odds for most teams--it's a gauntlet). But I'm not sure you can just say it's "one thing" (one flaw in their game) that accounts for those premature tourney departures. It's impossible to argue with absolute empirical certainty that it is or isn't, but one thing we all can possibly agree on is there are multiple variables in play (some quantitative, some qualitative, some more weighty than others, etc.).
Rock Chalk...
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
I do see that this year's team has improved its relative standing, in comparison to the full national field, in the 3PFGD department.
BUT...we're still 77th...and we're giving up slightly more in raw 3-point scoring this year over last. Even allowing for the slight national uptick in scoring (and one more made 3 for the top-ranked 3PFGD team in the land), we're still pretty "meh" or "middling" in this area.
I'm also not saying that 3PFGD wasn't a factor in KU's tourney losses in the past--it certainly was. But it certainly wasn't the ONLY factor. I could break down each of those losses, as I know others could here, and point to multiple factors--some of them of the truly head-scratching variety. But we've already done that (in the aftermath of the losses themselves--one of which I sadly experienced live), so there's no sense in regurgitating those threads (even if we could, which we can't on the new board--archives are gone).
The above notwithstanding, I love and appreciate your quant-takes, ATX. Keep them up!
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ATXJayhawk
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 56
- Thank you received: 46
I agree, we don't need to bring up past shortcomings as it's all been explained here before. I just wanted to start a discussion of KU defending the three this year and how good of a 3 point shooting team we've become.
Crimson and blue looks so much better than burnt orange!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
NOTE: My session got timed out by the time I tried to submit this, so in the interim have been at least 2 bb related posts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- porthawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1775
- Thank you received: 1423
It hasn't stopped Kansas. Through Kevin Durant and Blake Griffin, through two years in which not a single starter returned, in years that saw pedestrian 3-4 conference starts, there's Kansas, always finding a way to the top of the Big 12.
1. What is the second year where no starters returned?
2. I know we started a season 3-4 overall (I believe it was Chalmers's freshmen year -- the '05-'06 season), but I don't think we had a 3-4 conference start. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LKF_HAWK
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 753
- Thank you received: 383
In 05-06 Hawks started 1-2 in the Conf and then went 11-1 and won the Big X12 Tourney
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
I don't think we had a 3-4 conference start. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Some mainstream media commentator just wrote a really nice piece on KU's conference performances for the entire duration of the streak, and I can't seem to recall who the heck it was. It covered how we started and then finished each season (in conference), to include home and away breakdowns. Does anyone else remember seeing it?
The reason I ask is the point the author made was that, in virtually every season, KU started the conference season very strongly. That's why the 3-4 conference starts assertion (stated by this author in the plural) doesn't seem right to me, either. I'd love to remember that article and author, so I could find it and post it here, but it's completely escaping me now. I'll try to jog the memory some more, but if anyone can recall it, please post it.
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- konza63
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Moderator
- c'85 Towering toward the Blue
- Posts: 2203
- Thank you received: 1280
I'm also glad to know that my memory bank isn't shot, and that the author was dead wrong in stating that we had not just one but more than one season in which we started 3-4 in conference.
Rock Chalk...
“With kindest regards to Dr. Forrest C. Allen, the father of basketball coaching, from the father of the game.”
1936 inscription on the portrait of Dr. Naismith, displayed above Phog Allen's office desk at KU.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- porthawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1775
- Thank you received: 1423
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HawkErrant
- Offline
- Moderator
- b82, g84 Lift the chorus...
- Posts: 7058
- Thank you received: 5545
2008-09 after the NC
lost Rush, Chalmers, Arthur, Jackson, Russell Robinson, Kaun and more
and
2013-14
lost Withey, Young, Releford, McLemore and Elijah Johnson
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's lifetime." - Mark Twain "Innocents Abroad"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- porthawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1775
- Thank you received: 1423
08-09 after the NC.
In 05-06 Hawks started 1-2 in the Conf and then went 11-1 and won the Big X12 Tourney
So is it '05-'06 or '13-'14...or both?
In '04-'05 starters Simien, Langford, and Miles graduated. Who were the other two starters that year?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JRhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 704
- Thank you received: 358
While maybe technically true, the 08-09 team had Collins who played significant minutes the year before, plus Morningstar a RS-So, Reed & Teahan So's, Aldrich who averaged 8..3 min and had an outstanding FF-Semi game vs UNC. Also, Little a Jr from a high calibered JUCO team. Plus freshmen Morris twins, Releford, & TT. The 13-14 team had Tharpe - Jr who played a lot the year before. Black - Sr, Ellis So, plus Wiggins, Embiid, Mason, Selden, Greene, & Frankamp freshman. Not like the cupboard was bare either year.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.