×
Rock Chalk Talk: Basketball
Anything pertaining to basketball: college, pro, HS, recruiting, TV coverage
Anything pertaining to basketball: college, pro, HS, recruiting, TV coverage
NCAA to Let Underclassmen Return After testing waters...
- Sieverling
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Administrator
- c'86. Call me Dave
8 years 10 months ago #1895
by Sieverling
from NYT
N.C.A.A. to Let Underclassmen Return to College After Trying Out for N.B.A.
Hic manebimus optime
“This legislation, with help from the N.B.A., will allow student-athletes the opportunity to make informed decisions on their true status as a draft prospect before forfeiting their collegiate eligibility,” Kansas Coach Bill Self said in an N.C.A.A. statement.
from NYT
N.C.A.A. to Let Underclassmen Return to College After Trying Out for N.B.A.
Hic manebimus optime
The following user(s) said Thank You: jayhawk969
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Share this page:
- hairyhawk
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 1202
- Thank you received: 692
8 years 10 months ago #1897
by hairyhawk
That is good for the players. I think they are trying to keep their work for free players and so making concessions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- NotOstertag
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 1957
- Thank you received: 2162
8 years 10 months ago #1900
by NotOstertag
"When I was a freshman, I remember Coach Naismith telling us how important it was to play good defense." - Mitch Lightfoot
It's a step in the right direction, but like anything along these lines, I'm not sure that it goes far enough.
While it's great that a kid can go to combine, work out, etc. and still come back, my fear is that it still is happening too late for the student.
Take Cliff Alexander. While all of the facts will probably never be known, it's clear that he or somebody close to him took a loan, and it cost him not only in a loss of games at the end of last season, but also his potential draft position, and to a great extent, his opportunity to come back to school for another year. It would seem that both he and his parents believed up until his suspension that he was a lottery pick (or at least a 1st round guy), and so I doubt that there was ever any serious thought about coming back for a 2nd year, until circumstances conspired to make that opportunity impossible (or very difficult). The result: he goes undrafted, plays his way onto the roster in Portland and is averaging 4 minutes and 1.7 ppg, and may or may not have much of a career in the league.
How does this relate to this rule change? It's relevant because I'm sure that many players essentially take their 2nd semester of their last year "off" as they prepare for the draft. As long as they remain eligible through the end of the season, there are no consequences. If you take a class where the grade is determined by a midterm and a final, the midterm might not hit until March and any failing grades might not hit the radar until after the season. At that point, the student is off working out and preparing for the draft. If a kid wakes up under the new rule in late May and realizes that he isn't going to be drafted, his grades might be bad enough that he might not be eligible the next season (without a whole lot of makeup work over the summer).
So while I think this rule is a great step, I still don't think it's as strong as having a kid agree to play for at least 2 (3?) seasons as a condition of their scholarship.
While it's great that a kid can go to combine, work out, etc. and still come back, my fear is that it still is happening too late for the student.
Take Cliff Alexander. While all of the facts will probably never be known, it's clear that he or somebody close to him took a loan, and it cost him not only in a loss of games at the end of last season, but also his potential draft position, and to a great extent, his opportunity to come back to school for another year. It would seem that both he and his parents believed up until his suspension that he was a lottery pick (or at least a 1st round guy), and so I doubt that there was ever any serious thought about coming back for a 2nd year, until circumstances conspired to make that opportunity impossible (or very difficult). The result: he goes undrafted, plays his way onto the roster in Portland and is averaging 4 minutes and 1.7 ppg, and may or may not have much of a career in the league.
How does this relate to this rule change? It's relevant because I'm sure that many players essentially take their 2nd semester of their last year "off" as they prepare for the draft. As long as they remain eligible through the end of the season, there are no consequences. If you take a class where the grade is determined by a midterm and a final, the midterm might not hit until March and any failing grades might not hit the radar until after the season. At that point, the student is off working out and preparing for the draft. If a kid wakes up under the new rule in late May and realizes that he isn't going to be drafted, his grades might be bad enough that he might not be eligible the next season (without a whole lot of makeup work over the summer).
So while I think this rule is a great step, I still don't think it's as strong as having a kid agree to play for at least 2 (3?) seasons as a condition of their scholarship.
"When I was a freshman, I remember Coach Naismith telling us how important it was to play good defense." - Mitch Lightfoot
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.