NCAA or ACT or Student malfeasance?

This is a clear case where the NCAA needs to take responsibility. Just as they dragged their feet with Diallo, this case is similar, but much, much worse.

There appears to be exactly ZERO consistency of due process with the NCAA. Folks, this stuff shouldn't be that hard. If the NCAA cleared him and now wants to go back on that, THEY need to be raked over the coals.

How it should work:
1.) Inform recruits of the requirements and due dates to be eligible. If they meet them,
2.) Review their records with a deadline of determining eligibility by the time classes start.
3.) If the NCAA misses THEIR due date, the player is eligible.

Of course, this MIGHT force the NCAA to prioritize their investigations. I'm guessing 95% are probably a rubber stamp, no question deal. If the NCAA doesn't have enough people to get the job done, they need to funnel some of the huge piles of money they rake in to hiring enough people to do the job.

Short of the player intentionally hiding information, or keeping info from the NCAA, the player shouldn't be screwed.

By all appearances, the NCAA dropped the ball on this one, but they don't seem to want to take responsibility.

So corrupt.